January 2026 – Allbridge has announced a new cross-chain architecture, designed to unify multiple bridging models into a single routing system that selects the most efficient transfer method per asset, chain pair, and market condition.
After years of operating traditional bridge infrastructure, the team says the industry’s main failures were not technical but user-facing: fragmented assets, unreliable arrival experiences, and dependence on liquidity that introduced hidden costs.
“Users don’t just want to move tokens – they want to move value and be able to act immediately on the destination chain,” said Allbridge’s founder. “The new architecture will be designed around that reality.”
A Hybrid Model Instead of a Single Rail
The new architecture integrates multiple existing transfer models rather than committing to a single architecture:
- Native rails, such as Circle’s CCTP for USDC and USDT’s OFT model, are used where available.
- Liquidity pools and intent-based fulfillment serve as fallbacks for routes where native rails do not yet exist.
- A routing engine dynamically selects the optimal path based on asset type, supported chains, and current market conditions.
According to the company, this approach avoids forcing users into a single ecosystem or stablecoin universe and preserves access across both EVM and non-EVM chains.
Focus on UX
Beyond transfer mechanics, the next Allbridge architecture emphasizes what the company calls the “arrival experience,” including:
- destination gas provisioning,
- fee abstraction,
- automated finalization, and
- routing that avoids dead ends.
“These features are no longer differentiators – they’re requirements,” the team stated. “Without them, multichain still feels like a sequence of technical rituals rather than a single experience.”
Privacy as a Built-In Option
Allbridge new architecture also introduces optional privacy routing inspired by emerging Privacy Pool designs, aimed at improving user protection while remaining compatible with compliance frameworks
Transfers can be routed through dedicated pools with cryptographic commitments, allowing users to reduce public transaction traceability while preserving compliance options through relayer-based context handling.
The company describes this as a “user protection layer” rather than a separate product or a fully opaque system.
Roadmap for the Next Six Months
Allbridge outlined several priorities for the next development phase:
- native-feeling stablecoin routing,
- guaranteed transfer reliability via fallback mechanisms,
- default integration of swap + bridge flows,
- privacy as an opt-in routing mode, and
- continued first-class support for non-EVM chains.
Positioning
Allbridge frames its strategy as “and, not or” – combining architectures rather than replacing them.
“If you think the future of bridging is one rail or one ecosystem, we disagree,” the company said. “Our goal is a system that chooses the right primitive per route, per asset, and per moment – without asking users to become liquidity engineers.”
Media contact:
Company Name: Allbridge
Contact Person: Andrii Velykyi
E-mail: av@allbridge.io
Website: allbridge.io
Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Infobeat Today journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.